"Imported milk powder accounts for nearly 90% share" worth reflecting on

At the Third Plenary Session of the Fourth Session of the Eleventh National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, when Liu Peizhi made a speech at the conference, in 2009 after the Sanlu incident, the import of dairy products in China soared from 120,600 tons to 597,000 tons; the import of high-end infants and young children The share of milk powder is close to 90%.

In January of this year, the annual Consumer Food Safety Confidence Report published by the “Xiaokang” magazine showed that nearly 70% of the public “have no sense of security” about food. Liu Peizhi said that the hidden dangers in China's food safety are mainly man-made pollution and "adding flooding." He suggested that industry, governments at all levels, industry associations, etc. should fulfill their duties to ensure that consumers "eat safely and eat with confidence."

Unlike some high-tech products, many large foreign dairy products invade China, relying not on high technology, but only on the principle of “enterprise” and not on dairy products. As a result, they have won national recognition. . Foreign dairy products are so simple that they “account for nearly 90% of the share” and deserve our deep reflection. Why can people produce dairy products “cleanly” and we have to do things in dairy products and add something we shouldn’t add. Just make dairy products “drugs”? It can be said that not how good these foreign dairy products companies are, but that some of our companies have not defeated themselves by ignoring the minimum morality.

In fact, Sanlu is not the only food company that makes hands and feet in dairy products, nor is it the first food company to work hand in hand in dairy products. In recent years, food safety incidents such as tainted milk powder, poisoned meat floss, poisonous ham, and poisonous sausages have emerged in an endless stream. Chemical materials such as Sudan Red, hydrogen peroxide, and melamine have become the main raw materials for domestic food companies to make food. It is impolite to say that some outstanding foreign food companies are making food honestly, and some of our domestic food companies are doing "drugs," which has affected the health of the people and even made some children pay the price of their lives. And those black-hearted enterprises that have lost sight of their interests and interests will ultimately send themselves to no return. The bankruptcy of Sanlu should be said to be a ringing alarm.

In fact, domestic dairy products companies have always been dominant, and most of the domestic markets are domestic companies. However, because they do not pay attention to image-building, food safety issues have repeatedly caused consumer confusion. As a result, domestic consumers voted with their feet and abandoned many domestic dairy products. Foreign dairy products also took advantage of them and became a hot commodity for the Chinese people. This is indeed very sad.

In this regard, some domestic food companies need a deep reflection. Why do some of our food companies not think about how to make food, to survive with quality and credit, to occupy the market, but to rack their brains to earn money? Can such a company stand up? Is there a market for such a product? Who will save domestic food companies?

Similar to "nearly 70% of the public does not feel safe about food," imported milk powder accounts for nearly 90% of the share, which also makes us deeply disturbed. This shows that our food industry safety issues are very serious. If we do not do a good job of food quality production and supervision, if the domestic food companies do not “self-salvage” themselves, they will lose more—of course, we do not want this scenario to emerge.