Anxious supplier! American patients are not interested in mobile medicine
Release date: 2015-01-26
“How many patients have asked questions about mobile medical devices accessing electronic medical records?†The official website of Forbes magazine recently published a new survey completed by Practice Fusion, a mobile medical device that connects medical data activities and Method, there are not many patients interested, only a very small number of patients require sharing data in APP and device.
Practice Fusion is a provider of electronic health records (electronic medical records) based on medical big data and rapidly growing into a free electronic health record. More than 112,000 professional medical staff currently use the company's cloud-based software, and the company keeps in touch with the doctor community every week to determine how much they are willing to pay for a product. This feedback helps the company make better business decisions.
The survey with 20,000 doctors was: "Your patient has asked about accessing themselves from wearable health tracking devices (eg, Firbit or Jawbone UP) or through other health apps (such as Apple's HealthKit, etc.). Is there a problem with electronic medical records?"
Apple's latest HealthKit platform will integrate data from different applications and devices. Electronic medical record providers expect that with Apple's influence, consumers may be able to bring an electronic health record to their doctor's office.
The patient-driven, smartphone-based healthcare revolution has not yet slammed the door to US medical practice, at least for American doctors. The survey, completed in just two days, showed that 85% of the 353 doctors (mostly primary care physicians) who responded to the questionnaire said that the patient had never asked such a question.
In fact, Practice Fusion CEO Ryan Howard has not yet integrated his electronic medical record with HealthKit. But Epic Systems Corporation, Cerner CERN, and Athenahealth Electronic Medical Records have done this.
Perhaps the most reluctant thing doctors do is to look at the vast amount of data that has doubts about practicality.
When asked about the latest findings, Howard said: "We are concerned about money. (from APPs) data is of little value." But there are exceptions, which APP and tracking devices are worth recommending? Practice Fusion has Integrates the Diasend glucose management system and the AliveCor based smartphone-based ECG system. But the real problem is that many doctors and patients don't know anything about such a solution. The promotion and promotion time is tight and the task is heavy. Even if the patient wants to share health data from Fitbit, the doctor may be busy scoring.
Practice Fusion, which analyzes the main business of anonymous data, has to be cautious in terms of data security. For example, the privacy protection regulations issued by Apple stipulate that APP is not allowed to sell information to data agents. In order for an APP to share user (consumer) information, the user must first obtain the user's consent, and the consumer has the right to know the specific use of the data.
The fact that "very few patients require sharing data in apps and devices" is not surprising. According to Fierce MobileHealthcare's official website, the latest survey found that 48% of American adults are interested in using their mobile phones and iPads to check blood pressure, 47% are interested in detecting heartbeats, and 23% are interested in using mobile medical apps and devices. .
The latest findings have raised several questions: Is mobile medical technology attractive to patients and too advanced? Is mobile medical technology now completely out of the consumer? What measures can be taken to allow patients to make relevant decisions during the next physical examination or visit? What are the issues related to mobile medical technology? How can we promote medical and patient care and exchanges about mobile medical technology?
The answer to the first and second questions is yes. While scientists have developed new wearable devices that diagnose diseases through sweat rather than blood, cell phones can also be used as glaucoma detectors, but the number of people using wearable devices to track heart rate and blood pressure is frustrating.
More than 50% of patients who download mobile medical apps admit that they are no longer used after six months. There are thousands of fingertips on the patient's fingertips, but the conversation between the doctor/patient and the health care provider about the APP is almost zero. This is not good news for anyone, from patients to doctors to taxpayers.
The answer to this is how to change the current problem: establish incentives.
Stimulate and motivate consumers (patients) to make full use of innovative technologies and equipment to play an active role in managing their health and medical records. However, the implementation process is extremely difficult, despite the insurance premium discount and the promotion of brands such as Apple, Google and Samsung, and the biggest reason is that like other high-tech efforts, the promotion, identification, use and promotion of mobile medical tools also need Time and knowledge. To solve these problems, it is necessary to create a path to stimulate consumers and patients to increase the use of mobile medical devices, which requires coordination and cooperation between health care service providers, medical institutions, doctors, patients and so on.
Source: Caixin LIFE
Nutritional Fudge,Fudgesicle Nutrition,Fudge Nutrition Facts,Fudgesicle Nutrition Facts
Guangzhou Etechange Biological Engineering Co.,Ltd. , https://www.etechange.com